tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-527242886340702312.post5446313203114227206..comments2023-09-28T00:27:18.615-07:00Comments on Tom in Vegas: Election Year Jumble (Catholic Style)Tom in Vegashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17821971426359725229noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-527242886340702312.post-75602790254248654022008-03-31T21:34:00.000-07:002008-03-31T21:34:00.000-07:00Auntie A-I hear you about those other two. I cring...Auntie A-<BR/><BR/>I hear you about those other two. I cringe at the thought of an administration (or <EM>mis-</EM>administration) spearheaded by these two.<BR/><BR/>justme-<BR/><BR/>Excellent point! And this is the first time I've heard that Ron Paul was pro-life. I can't remember if it was CNN or MSNBC that described him as pro-abortion.Tom in Vegashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17821971426359725229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-527242886340702312.post-43962294098699835512008-03-31T20:39:00.000-07:002008-03-31T20:39:00.000-07:00The thing is, we shall have to answer not only for...The thing is, we shall have to answer not only for every word spoken, but for every vote cast that decimated life. We're in the mega-millions abortion-wise.. yet we could catch up to that disgusting abomination of a figure, war-wise. People, unless you vote for Ron Paul, there's NO ONE to vote for. We NEVER have to vote for someone. Jesus said render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's. Well, if Caesar is likely to a) kill babies, or b) kill babies <I>and</I> many adults, then I say Caesar is stealing what is God's, and we have NO valid choice. If Ron Paul -- pro-life and pro-life -- hangs in there til the end, he'll have my vote, as he did in the primary, along with 3 of my kids' campaign help.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-527242886340702312.post-29158225205717837552008-03-30T18:16:00.000-07:002008-03-30T18:16:00.000-07:00John McCain here. The other two strike fear and l...John McCain here. The other two strike fear and loathing in my heart.Adriennehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01562944653624224107noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-527242886340702312.post-83416302625969710912008-03-30T15:50:00.000-07:002008-03-30T15:50:00.000-07:00Jaime-I think you're correct about abstaining from...Jaime-<BR/><BR/>I think you're correct about abstaining from voting. It's just that I know so many people who are so disillusioned with the presidential candidates that they don't want to contribute an endorsement and down the line discover they backed the wrong horse. I can understand where they are coming from.<BR/><BR/>Thank you for your input.Tom in Vegashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17821971426359725229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-527242886340702312.post-45495533135601412092008-03-30T14:03:00.000-07:002008-03-30T14:03:00.000-07:00Hi Tom,Coming straight from the U.S.bishops, parap...Hi Tom,<BR/>Coming straight from the U.S.bishops, paraphrased months after the official announcement in our parish. <BR/>Since no candidate stands for all 6 moral criteria (I can't remember what they all are) we may feel free as individuals to choose what issues are most important to us and vote for the candidate we feel will help those issues come to pass.<BR/>There is no moral right or wrong vote. <BR/>In my opinion, it is never better to choose not to vote.Janehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15984305420691237277noreply@blogger.com